She lived in Naples, Bern, and Washington, among other places. Her natural intelligence, beauty, and cultivated manners, together with the experience of living in different parts of the world, made her of one of the most sophisticated women of her time. Clarice had two sons: Pedro and Paulo. However, this was an early indicator of mental problems, and later on, he was diagnosed with schizophrenia. Clarice was not a very political person, although she was aware of and hurt by the injustices and inequalities she observed in her adopted country.
During the beginning of the hardest of the dictatorship years in Brazil, in the late 60s, she took part in demonstrations and spoke out against the military coup.
Streamlining the info you need.
Close friends claim that Clarice was a lonely and difficult woman, especially after she left her husband in the late 50s and decided to live with her sons in Rio. Clarice survived a fire started when she fell asleep with a lit cigarette in her hand. At this time she lived in an apartment in Leme, a stretch of beach close to the fashionable Copacabana of the s. The third-degree burns left her badly scarred for life, especially her right hand — which she used for writing!
Clarice had a totally modern and original way of writing. Themes related to motherhood, as well as reflections on how she missed her own mother, figured largely in her work. Her ideas were heavily influenced by the philosopher Spinoza and the language she used made her an extraordinarily creative and original writer.
She died of ovarian cancer in at age Conhecido como o Bruxo do Cosme Velho o tradicional bairro carioca onde morava , Machado foi um dos fundadores da Academia Brasileira de Letras Eis alguns dos seus pensamentos mais populares, expressos nos seus livros:. Dom Casmurro.
Literatura | subsnobssigdehyd.ml
Matamos o tempo, o tempo nos enterra. Quincas Borba. His songs remain as relevant and powerful as they used to be for the counterculture youth of the s. To this day, those songs continue to inspire, constantly featuring in contemporary movies and TV series, as a way to contextualize and illuminate universal themes and feelings. On October 13 Bob Dylan was awarded one of the most important literary prizes in the world: the Nobel. With your study group, family or friends, discuss the questions below.
You can share some of your answers with us in the comments section. How do the s in general compare to the s? Point out some similarities and differences. What could it refer to now? What does the metaphor to look up and really see the sky mean? Like this: Like Loading Italo Calvino.
Easily find the right book idea for the right audience
I couldn't recall a word of my prepared speech. He was a big man, tall, narrow-hipped, wide-shouldered, and he stood with his feet spread apart, his arms hanging at his sides. He was crouched forward slightly with his weight on his toes, in the instinctive poise of a fighter ready to hit. After an awkward moment, Samuelson explained that he had bummed his way from Minneapolis just to see him.
I liked it so much I came down to have a talk with you. I thought you wanted to visit. After another night in jail, Samuelson returned to the house and found Hemingway sitting in the shade on the north porch, wearing khaki pants and bedroom slippers. He had a glass of whiskey and a copy of the New York Times. The two men began talking. Sitting there on the porch, Samuelson could sense that Hemingway was keeping him at a safe distance: "You were at his home but not in it. Almost like talking to a man out on a street.
Hemingway offered some advice. Leave a little for the next day. The main thing is to know when to stop. Don't wait till you've written yourself out. When you're still going good and you come to an interesting place and you know what's going to happen next, that's the time to stop. Then leave it alone and don't think about it; let your subconscious mind do the work. The next morning, when you've had a good sleep and you're feeling fresh, rewrite what you wrote the day before. When you come to the interesting place and you know what is going to happen next, go on from there and stop at another high point of interest.
That way, when you get through, your stuff is full of interesting places and when you write a novel you never get stuck and you make it interesting as you go along. Samuelson said he had not. You ought to read it. We'll go up to my workshop and I'll make out a list you ought to read. Fair enough. You've clearly demonstrated by use of facts that a new dark age is upon us.
Let's play the game a different way. The experts have declared Tolstoy is the best. Have you read Anna Karenina or War and Peace? All the way to the end? If you have read one or both, would you agree with this mighty consensus of experts that Tolstoy is the greatest author of all time?
If you haven't read one or both, why not? Seeing as how he is the best, why procrastinate?
If you choose not to answer, I will have to assume that either: a You were afraid to read either of them because you were worried with good cause that they might be terminally boring b You did try to read one of them but gave up a third of the way through. Honestly and I'm not trying to get political here as I already have a warning , I think that in literary circles it's hard to say you're pro-Dostoevsky or pro-Solzhenitsyn. The paper describes situations in which these 'pseudoquestions' are used and characterizes speakers' intentions they convey, but it ends rather inconclusively noting that the neither formal nor pragmatic characterization could disentangle their nature.
Further, they are functionally and semantically opposed to other reduplicative structures such as coordination and juxtaposition which may involve categories other than nouns.
It is argued that these expressions are not just unanalyzable idioms. Its semantic analysis should be of interest to both linguists and teachers alike. Semantic structure of connotation is carefully studied within a model of semantic theory that combines linguistic semantics which explains denotative meanings and symptomatic semantics which explains connotative meanings. Juan Crespo Hidalgo's meticulous study suggests that detailed information of more personal nature on Covarrubias helps us understand his lexicographic skills and criteria used in his works.
Filter your results
Covadonga Pendones de Pedro contributes a textual study dealing with the representation of discourse architecture. Volume 9 contains twelve articles, two notes, and seven reviews. He describes different stages of lexicalization of acronyms e. It offers analyses at various linguistic levels with many examples. It concludes that bueno is in a more advanced stage of the grammaticalization process than bien These two contributions are welcome additions to the list of variation studies of Spanish. In a lexical-dialectal study, Ana Isabel Navarro Carrasco emphasizes the importance of making a good use of many available linguistic atlases in Spain in preparing more comprehensive dictionaries with dialectal differences including also, e.
The contribution by Veronica Orazi is an eleven-page list of legal terms contained in the thirteenth-century Old Leonese document, Fuero Juzgo. Its main purpose is to call for more attention to philological studies of legal terms in medieval Hispano-Romance, an often ignored subfield in Hispanic philology. The articles included in volumes 8 and 9 of ELUA cover a variety of topics in many branches of linguistics from philological studies to pragmatic analyses and from morphology to cognitive semantics, except for formal syntax. They vary in length from eleven pages to forty-five pages and in nature from listing to descriptive to more theoretical.